Dismal, yes. Scientific dissent? Not so much

One might think, judging from the BBC headline — “Dissent among scientists over key climate impact report” — about the coming new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, that there is great controversy and disagreement among the hundreds of contributing scientist-authors over the report’s conclusions.

One would be wrong.

After noting that “some attendees” say the climate summary is “too alarmist,” the article goes on to quote one — yes, one — source who actually makes that claim. And that source is … an expert on climate modeling? An atmospheric science specialist? A paleoclimatologist?

No. The dissenting source is … wait for it … an economist.

If economics has done quite a bit since the global economic meltdown, rising inequality and the embrace of austerity to earn its reputation as the “dismal science,” responsible journalism — clearly — isn’t far behind.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: